There's a piece in the Observer today, about a piece of working I'm doing about children learning to ride bikes, which seems to me to sum up something about how early childhood is seen. The article gives a bit of an alarming impression of me "spearheading" an experiment to prove that stabilisers hold children's progress back when they are learning to ride a bike, the implication also being that parents who still use stabilisers are getting it all wrong. Actually it's all rather more muddled than that - just an idea, a little experiment to give children bikes without stabilisers and see what happens.
When I read the article, I thought - what if I had come back from a morning in the local park, damp, after putting the required hours into encouraging my child round on stabilisers, or holding the back of the seat in the time-honoured, back-paining manner, and read that I was doing it all wrong. That sense that you try your hardest, only for some so-called "expert" to say you got it wrong.
So - though the report is perfectly reasonable and fair, it comes across in a way that will, I think, make some parents feel that they have neglected the "best" way to do things. Hopefully other parents will read it and think that they learnt to ride a bike with stabilisers, as did the kids over the road, and who's to say all of a sudden it's all wrong?
To end on a personal note - I love my bike and I take special interest in how the children where I work start to learn to ride bikes. I felt increasingly turned off the traditional nursery school trikes because of seeing children simply tearing round on them for a year, or more, without really developing much. It was more like they were getting away from something...The wooden LikeABikes are tricky for children at first, but they soon get the hang of them, and it has been wonderful to see very little children managing to balance and zoom around on two-wheeled bikes. So I am excited by the prospect of doing more to introduce children to two-wheelers, and it seems to me that this is exactly what children's centres are for - to experiment, and to enjoy the capability of little children.
Since the piece in the Observer, I've had several emails from parents and others who have taught their children to ride by starting off with wooden two-wheeled bikes, and I've also been introduced to the concept of countersteering which might explain why stabilisers may not be as helpful as they seem. So I'm looking forward to seeing how the children get on over the summer and whether we can help a generation of nursery-leavers to be confident cyclists.
You can see some Islington children on the LikeABikes here.
My daughter was given a bike without stabilisers last summer, just before she turned three. We immediately set out on the road... and I was delighted to find that I could propel her along with one hand on each of her shoulders, at running pace, hopping from one side of the bike to the other in order to ensure she was always leaning towards me.
ReplyDeleteBy travelling at a decent pace Eleri soon got the idea that the lean on the bike meant changing direction, not falling off.
We didn't get around to riding the bike through most of the winter... but two weeks ago we picked it up and on the very first outing, Eleri was balaning the bike nicely for short stretches.
By the third outing of the week, Eleri was completing several hundred yards down a steep hill with me sprinting along behind and getting ready to pick up the pieces - but as she only struggled when the bike slowed to a crawl, this never occurred.
Eleri's now able to descend gentler slopes in total control and can basically cycle indefinitely in terms of balance and steering - it's just the power to propel herself on the flat and uphill that she lacks.
A 2 year old came whizzing past me yesterday, free wheeling on a beautifully made 2 wheeler. Reminded me of skiing in Austria where children barely able to stand, glide, swerve and carve through the snow laden mountain slopes. His dad lagged behind in a valiant effort to master the art of roller blading. Never too old i suppose... then again...never too young? http://www.islabikes.co.uk/bike_pages/rothan.html
ReplyDeleteIslabikes(.co.uk) are fanctastic - cheaper and better made than the wooden bikes.
ReplyDeleteI got a Rothan for my son when he turned 2. I got him the cnoc16 when he turned 3 within months he was cycling happily for miles, often up to 6 miles at a time!